Sunday, March 4, 2012

Chester's Last Lecture...


I know a guy named Chester, a former business man,  who had the good fortune to be able to retire early and do almost anything he wanted. For reasons not even clearly understood by Chester,  what he has been doing for the last two years is show up most mornings at the local Psychiatric Hospital to volunteer on the in-patient substance abuse unit where patients (often admitted to the hospital from a detox facility) spend their next 28 days (or less depending on insurance) participating in a series of daily groups where they are taught about the science of chemical dependence, coping skills, and the mental, spiritual and social aspects of substance abuse by an experienced and dedicated staff of addiction counselors, social workers, nurses, mental health workers and psychiatrists, some of whom are in recovery themselves, some not, but all of whom, for reasons of their own, show up everyday to provide advice, counsel, inspire, educate, and house people who are fighting long odds in their battle against addiction (sometimes referred to by the counselors as “committing suicide on the installment plan”).


Mostly, Chester says, he just listens to the patients, one-on-one in the lounge or as he accompanies them to the X-ray lab or to the resource room  to use the computer. Everyone likes to be heard and Chester is a good listener and many of the patients like to be heard by Chester who one addict described as having "yes eyes, a yes attitude and just being a yes kind of fellow". Most days that was enough motivation for Chester to get up and get to the hospital by 8:30 AM when the staff meet at rounds to discuss the patients’ progress and new admissions before the daily routine starts. 

In addition to talking to the patients, the staff occasionally let Chester co-lead groups but most days he sits in groups and just listens. And by listening Chester tries to soak in all he hears from the staff and the addicts. Chester has also read a fair amount about addiction, not so much reading addiction medical articles but more the literature of addiction; memoirs, biography, novels, movies and poems. 

On those day that that Chester does co-lead a group he usually focuses on certain addiction themes like "denial", "triggers" ("people places and things"), "the 12 Steps" and "coping skills". But Chester recently sent me a copy of his notes for a group that he occasionally leads that is a little different - what he calls Chester's Last Group. Chester will tell you that almost none of what he wrote are his words, most he says come from things he has learned or heard from the staff, from addicts and from the writers and poets from whom he has, without attribution,  stolen liberally because Chester thinks they say it better than he can. Whether these are his words or not, Chester says this sums up a lot of how he sees addicts and addiction. I think it says a lot about how I see Chester.  Here it is:


"On a recent Saturday I wrote down what I thought I might say to you if I was only going to lead one more group, sort of a "Chester's Last Group" – what I would want to say to you if I had only one chance to say anything.


First one caveat, if I offend anyone, I apologize. I mean no offense but I have to say some truths and, cliche as it is, sometimes the truth does hurt. 



So here is the first truth, a lot of you, maybe all of you, have a lot of really good reasons to drink and drug and you also have a lot of really good excuses not to get sober. All really good reasons and good, compelling excuses, maybe even good explanations for why you use BUT, good as those reasons are none of them are valid. They are all just reasons to get high and to keep getting high.  So if you want one take away from this lecture remember two words - no excuses. Say it to yourself often and when you least believe it. No excuses. 

What you came to rehab to learn and what we spend days and sometimes weeks doing with you here and then you can spend months or years more when you leave is not about how to find the courage to beat your addiction. Courage you all already have, way beyond anything non-addicted civilians can ever understand – because you have the kind of  courage and fuck you-ness it takes to be an addict.  But as brave as each of you are, your disease will kill you and before you die it will make you suffer and along the way you will hurt everyone who ever loved you.

There is this thing that is standing in your way. And I am not alone in knowing this, every counselor, case worker, doctor, nurse and mental health worker here sees it –  right now your disease, even as you sit here, is standing behind you clamping two giant hands on your shoulders whispering to your neck “it does not matter what he says, you only listen to me”.

And to varying degrees each of you will try to figure out why you use drugs, and you will focus on your complaints, cravings, resentments and terrors and think about how you both want to get sober and at the same time don’t and how you love the very thing that is killing you.

But everyone of you, if you are honest,  already know that you can no longer live a life with drugs even as you cannot imagine a life without drugs.

But, pared down to the bone, none of that matters nearly as much as simply not putting chemicals into your body.

And please do not think I am giving you moral advice or that I am telling you what to do or that I even expect that you can do it because it is not easy to do. It is hard, it takes real effort and some days you will not be able to do it. That is part of the process. But there will come a day when, as cold or as disappointed as you may be, even hungry, or when you drop the grocery bag on the sidewalk, or the coffee spills on your sweater at 7:00 AM on your way to look for yet another job that you probably will not get or you want to hit someone, that -  if you do not pick up and put a chemical in your body -you will be gripped by a cherishing so deep for the fact that you are a grateful recovering addict that it will leave you speechless.

Of course this is not likely to happen from your having listened to me today. That is why you will keep attending more groups, and do all that is expected of you here. And that is what you should do. But I also want you to know that it is not impossible that when you are discharged you can walk out of here knowing that you have another option.

Staying clean requires daily attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, in myriad petty, little, boring, un-sexy ways. It means going to a program of some kind, be it out patient or a l2-Step program. You have to work your program every day, get a home group, get a sponsor or a therapist  and tell him or her the truth, pray for help whether you believe in God or not, get phone numbers of sober people and call them, make sober friends and develop a sober network and lose the old friends.   That is how you will get sober and stay sober.

What you need to know is that your life is not only important, it is sacred. You are on fire with the same force that lights the stars. Not that I have any idea what actually lights the stars but it does not matter because there is only one true thing that matters here and now – and that is that if the day you leave here you do not use chemicals, the next day will look better. It will not be paradise, it will be hard, it will be scary but the fact is that if you do not use drugs or alcohol, tomorrow will look very different than today.

I know that this may just sound like some sort of total bullshit and you can think of it that way if you want. But as far as I can tell it is the truth. None of this is about morality, or religion, or dogma, or big fancy questions of life after death or whether God exists or not. This is about life BEFORE death. It is about making it to 30, or maybe 50, it is about not  ending up in jail or in an institution.  It is about  the simple truth of what is so real and essential and so hidden in plain sight for you to see that you have to keep reminding yourself of it over and over one day at a time.

My name is Chester and I am a volunteer at this rehab.  Thank you for letting me share."

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Kickstarter

The video below describes Kickstarter. It is about 30 mins long but the second 15 minutes is Q & A so you can learn a lot by watching just the first half (although the second half is very informative). Kickstarter was founded by Yancey Strickler, the guy in the video who I find very appealing, sort of like Ferris Bueller made good. He seems so unassuming and natural and his ideas so easily presented and organized. Like - oh yeah - this makes total sense even though in some ways it seems completely implausible. The fact that it works and is as successful as it is says something. Maybe about the culture. I do not know why I say this but to me Kickstarter has an Occupy Wall Street feel to it -  a sort of adamant innocence about holding onto something before the world takes it from you (Footnote 1) - the idea that you can do what you want to do (even if what you want to do is just figure out what you want to do).  Anyway, I think Kickstarter is neat.

Footnote 1: Holding onto something before the world takes it from you is a big issue.  About 20 percent of five year old children given a choice to eat one marshmallow now or wait ten minutes and have two, eat the one now. Those same children who eat the one now go on to have a 50% higher rate of substance abuse, lower educational success, more legal issues and generally are less successful than the five year olds who choose to wait in order to get two marshmallows later. Bad habits seem to involve the notion of harm being a long way off - suicide on the installment plan. Good habits seem to be motivated by a belief that the pay off is within reaching distance.  If you ask people,  I think most will say that 20 years is a long time. Some will say it feels like it will be here tomorrow. I think that a "it will be here tomorrow" perspective would ward off tobacco cravings (no one would smoke if they thought they would get lung cancer in a month) while also stemming motivation to practice piano (everyone would practice piano if they thought they could learn to play well in a month).


What that has to do with Occupy Wall Street or Kickstarter, I do not know. 

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Herzog Observation Of The Week...

Werner Herzog seems to have an unlimted (and hilarious) attention span...

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Song of the Week - Wait For The Sun - by Ollabelle

Ollabelle is a NYC band (named after Appalachian songwriter Ola Bella Reed) formed at the bar 9C on 9th street and Avenue C about 15 years ago. I think this is a beautiful song. Here are the lyrics and the video is below that...

Don’t fade away
Don’t turn out the light of the day
When even the shadows are claimed by the dark

I won’t let you down
I won’t let them turn you around
Just hold on for now
The dawn isn’t far away
So just keep your stay

And wait for the sun
Wait for the sun

Tracks in the sand
And cracks in the clay where you stand
The wind sweeps away all that was lost and found
So go underground
And wait for the sun
Wait for the sun
Wait for the sun


Wait, wait for the sun
Wait, wait for the sun
Wait, wait for the sun
Wait, wait for the sun



Monday, February 6, 2012

Occupy Campaign Finance Reform

Imagine a political systems that allows anyone to run for election who can generate sufficient signatures to get on a ballot who are then each given the same amount of public money to spend on their election. Imagine being elected and not then spending 50% of your time fundraising. Imagine not  dialing for dollars, imagine no fundraisers, imagine no moneyed special interests, imagine no moneyed lobbying. Imagine not contributing to political parties or to political campaigns. Imagine if  the amount of money it takes to get elected was not obscene and corrosive.  Just a thought.

Here is an article that suggests that while there is some correlation and elasticity between charitable giving and political donations there is a zero sum point at which one negatively impacts the other. In other words,  at some point,  the millions given to political campaigns may come from the (picked) pockets of the needy.  Or, put another way:

BEAST VERY BAD, IT EAT EVERYTHING - NOT MAKE SENSE TO FEED BEAST MORE.  POLICY, DEVELOPMENT, INVESTMENT IN DOING GOOD MAKE SENSE.  ME VOTE FOR THAT GUY BUT ME NOT FEED BEAST.


QUOTATION OF THE DAY
"It's hard to pass the plate for super PAC money while Democratic leaders have been preaching about the sins of it. But the reality is, it is essential in 2012."
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN, a New York-based fund-raiser for President Obama.
ME THINK ZIMMERMAN WRONG. HIM WOULD GET MORE VOTES BY SAYING "WE NOT HAVE SUPER PAC'.  HIM CAN SAY THIS VERY LOUD - USE PEOPLE MEGAPHONE - BEAST NOT LIKE THAT. BEAST NOT LIKE CHANGE.


Do charitable subsidies crowd out political giving? The missing link between charitable and political contributions.

by Barış K. Yörük*

Abstract

This paper investigates the spillover effects of charitable subsidies on political giving using five independent surveys of charitable and political giving in the United States conducted from 1990 to 2001. The results show that charitable and political giving are complements. Compared with non-donors, charitable donors are more likely to donate and give more to political organizations. Increasing the price of charitable giving decreases not only charitable giving but also the probability of giving and the amount of donations to political organizations. The implied elasticity of the amount of political contributions with respect to the tax price of charitable giving is as much as -0.88. This effect is robust under different specifications and with different sets of instrumental variables. These results highlight the positive externalities created by charitable subsidies and have important implications for economic models of political and charitable giving.

Keywords: charitable giving, political giving, tax price of giving JEL classification: H24, H31, L38

* Department of Economics, University at Albany, SUNY, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12222. Tel: (518) 442-3175. Fax: (518) 442-4736. E-mail: byoruk@albany.edu.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

School District Resource Sharing


I did a quick read of some studies on school district consolidation and the informed consensus seems to come down against school district mergers (especially in poor districts). Based on the evidence, proposals to share school superintendents and/or merge school districts should be looked at sceptically because the data suggests that any economic savings are illusory and that there are no improvements in educational outcomes. This is especially true in times of economic pressures to cut school funding. There are some exceptions. Here's one example in California of two districts that have  shared a superintendent for the last 6 years with a seemingly positive local response. It does seem, however,  that this experience is the exception to the rule that school consolidation does not improve the educational experience or produce any significant cost savings.


(The article below is from a local newspaper, The Mountain Democrat, February 24, 2011)


Two school districts share superintendent


SUPERINTENDENT for both Gold Oak and Pioneer school districts, Dick Williams sits at his desk at the Gold Oak district office. Democrat photo by Krysten Kellum
SUPERINTENDENT for both Gold Oak and Pioneer school districts, Dick Williams sits at his desk at the Gold Oak district office. Democrat photo by Krysten Kellum
Predating all the talk about school district consolidation, two districts in El Dorado County have been pooling one of their resources for years. Dick Williams, superintendent of Pioneer Union School District since 1997, has also been the superintendent of  Gold Oak Union School District for the past six years.
“When the Gold Oak superintendent retired, the district was looking at ways to save money and get an experienced superintendent,” said Williams, 59. ” Vicki Barber, El Dorado County Office of Education superintendent, suggested a shared superintendency and she approached Gold Oak’s board.”
The innovative idea gave each of the small school districts an experienced superintendent and a savings in expense.
“It’s a shared position,” said Williams, “not a half-time position at each district. The superintendent is responsible for everything, 24/7. There’s no half-time about it. That responsibility carries quite a weight, but it’s worked very well.”
Gold Oak subcontracts for Williams’ services through Pioneer and each January, the Gold Oak Board of Trustees reviews the contract and chooses whether to renew it. This year, for the first time in six years, both districts have stated their intent to leave their option to renew the contract open for the moment.
“Taking on a second job didn’t double my salary, ” joked Williams, “but both boards have been very positive about the superintendency. It’s not the only shared superintendency in the state, but there aren’t many of them.”
Gold Oak Union School District Board of Trustees President Susanne Holtrichter said, “We’ve benefited from it greatly. I think he does a full-time job in half the time and we’re hopeful that we can continue sharing a superintendent.”
“It works extremely well and it’s great for both districts,” said  John D’Agostini, a seven-year Pioneer Union Board of Trustees member.
“With the uncertainty of the state budget, we’re not sure where all the pieces are going to fall,” said Holtrichter, “so we’re leaving our options open — not because we don’t want to continue sharing a superintendent, but because we just don’t know what we’re going to need to do.”
The Pioneer district also wanted to keep their options open, said D’Agostini. “We are weighing our options, depending on the state budget. This sharing has saved us a lot of money and allowed us to continue the educational programs we have despite the changes in the budget, but we may have to look at restructuring some things.”
“Things like funding and  what’s best for kids change all the time,” said Pioneer board member Mel Kelley. “We’ve got to be prepared to move with the changes.”
Williams understands completely.
“In February the districts really focus on making personnel budget decisions for the upcoming year. Pioneer has a declining enrollment. With a greater level of uncertainty due to  the state fiscal deficit. They make have to look at a reduction in administrative personnel or a restructuring of personnel, so both districts need to keep things open. A decision to renew the contract now would lock them in.”
Williams’ typical day puts him in both districts. “I try to start the day in one district and end in the other,” said Williams, “and I stagger the days so each district gets equal  a.m. and p.m. It doesn’t always happen, but that’s my goal.”
“The biggest difference between the districts is the wrestling,” said Williams. “In Gold Oak, wrestling is incredibly popular and they have teams at both the elementary and middle schools. At Pioneer, it’s a struggle to get a team together, yet the districts are right next door to each other. We try to give the kids who want to participate in wrestling an opportunity if there isn’t a team in their district.”
Both districts have three schools, but Williams said the culture of each district is different.
“The history of each district, the level of parent involvement and the culture of the community is unique. I had to learn the Gold Oak culture so I could make this work for them and not change it. That’s been one of the most fascinating things about the job.”
His dual roles have been challenging and a boost to  professional growth.
“I don’t know if it will last forever and it’s not always easy, but it’s been great.”

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Three Prayers...


Maybe prayer is a way to self induce a sense of connectedness (even if just for a split second)  that (somewhat paradoxically) transcends self absorption (if there even is such a thing, really). 

Here are three poems that I like in that vein. In Witness, Denise Levertov's  "mountain"  may be hidden in veils of inattention, apathy and fatigue but despite refusal or forgetting the mountain remains just a few yards away, there for the seeing.

And in The Wild Geese, Wendell Berry, similarly wants to be released from the clutter in his head. To be led by "abandon" the way we are in love or sleep, that, like it does to Geese on migration, would hold us to our way clear to what we need, to "here" (Does he mean what we need is here (geographically) or does he mean "here" as a noun - like we might need a hammer or a bell - in this case what we need is "here-ness")?  (The sheer abandon of the geese as they pass - in a way its own kind of "faith").

Both Levertov and Berry evoke the far away.. the mountain... the Geese high above us as the sky closes...to bring us to the not very far away at all; to ... here...or to a few yards up the road. It's like CS Lewis's wardrobe, you open the door to enter a new universe that is actually in your own living room all along. Or like Ram Das's simple suggestion about where and how to find the mountain: Be Here Now. Or what Marie Howe tells us in What The Living Do is "the everyday we speak of "when we feel a "cherishing so deep" it renders us speechless (or as Berry says "quiet in heart, and in eye, clear.") 

I like these poems a lot. They seem like prayers to me.

WITNESS

Sometimes the mountain

is hidden from me in veils

of cloud, sometimes

I am hidden from the mountain

in veils of inattention, apathy, fatigue,

when I forget or refuse to go

down to the shore or a few yards

up the road, on a clear day,

to reconfirm

that witnessing presence.


~ Denise Levertov ~


The Wild Geese

Geese appear high over us,
pass, and the sky closes. Abandon,
as in love or sleep, holds
them to their way, clear
in the ancient faith: what we need
is here. And we pray, not
for new earth or heaven, but to be
quiet in heart, and in eye,
clear. What we need is here.

—  Wendell Berry



What the Living Do

Johnny, the kitchen sink has been clogged for days, some utensil probably fell down there.
And the Drano won't work but smells dangerous, and the crusty dishes have piled up

waiting for the plumber I still haven't called. This is the everyday we spoke of.
It's winter again: the sky's a deep headstrong blue, and the sunlight pours through

the open living room windows because the heat's on too high in here, and I can't turn it off.
For weeks now, driving, or dropping a bag of groceries in the street the bag breaking,

I've been thinking: This is what the living do. And yesterday, hurrying along those
wobbly bricks in the Cambridge sidewalk, spilling my coffee down my wrist and sleeve,

I thought it again, and again later, when buying a hairbrush: This is it.
Parking. Slamming the car door shut in the cold. What you called that yearning.


What you finally gave up. We want the spring to come and the winter to pass. We want
whoever to call or not call, a letter, a kiss -- we want more and more and then more of it.

But there are moments, walking, when I catch a glimpse of myself in the window glass,
say, the window of the corner video store, and I'm gripped by a cherishing so deep

for my own blowing hair, chapped face, and unbuttoned coat that I'm speechless:

I am living, I remember you.

~ Marie Howe ~

Followers

 
Add to Technorati Favorites